THE GRAND
DOMESTIC REVOLUTION

THE GRAND
DOMESTIC REVOLUTION

USER'S MANUAL

USER'S MANUAL

‘The Grand Domestic Revolution—User’s Manual’ (GDR) investigates the domestic space and its (changing) use through a variety of methods and disciplines, traversing the fields of art, design, architecture, urban planning, activism and theory. A number of artists and other practitioners contribute to this endeavour. Residents from 2009-2011 include Sepake Angiama, Paul Elliman, and Doris Denekamp who utilized neighbourhood and online research to create prototypes and interventions around the theme of (Green) Cooperativsm. Wietske Maas and Travis Meinolf experimented with Home Production; while 'interor' infrastuctural interventions for the furniture, library and hallways were created by ifau & Jesko Fezer, Mirjam Thomann and Graziela Kunsch. Current themes and residents from February–October 2011 include Kyohei Sakaguchi and Kateřina Šedá who will each investigate forms of usership in architectures; home and housing rights with Maria Pask and Nazima Kadir; the question of invisible and domestic labour taken up by Werker Magazine; Agency will continue its deliberations on copyright issues of domestic THINGS (gardens and textiles); and keywords in relations to food service work will be workshopped with Xu Tan. Parallel to this, the Read-in activity continues. Initiated by artist Annette Krauss and theatre maker, Read-in is an open reading group inhabiting a different neighbour’s home for every session.

LIBRARY

LIBRARY

The GDR library constitutes the backbone of our ongoing ‘living research’ and thus grows over time. The library offers points of engagement with the project and consists of different research materials such as books, articles, images and DVDs (artist’s video, films) that are available for viewing when visiting the apartment. The first installment was done by the GDR team and was later adapted by Sao Paulo-based artist Graziela Kunsch who suggested that the GDR team create thematic selections.

APARTMENT 18B

APARTMENT 18B

'The Grand Domestic Revolution-User's Manual' is a long-term project developed as Casco’s contribution to 'Utrecht Manifest: Biennial for Social Design'. The project deals with the evolutionary and collaborative process of “living” research in the contemporary domestic and private sphere – particularly in relation to the spatial imagining (or the built environment). It aims at re-articulating while exercising the notions of the social, the public and, eventually, the commons.

TOWN MEETINGS

IN AFFINITY

IN AFFINITY

Since August 2010, the GDR team have undertaken research in order to connect with the local neighbourhood on questions relating to peoples’ social conditions and material environments. Questionnaires, interviews, and conversations are the methods used to explore the themes and problems addressed in GDR, such as self-organised governance, co-operative living, and spatial organisation in and from the domestic sphere.

WORKSHOP 'D.I.T BRICOLAGE' — St Joost MA Fine Art students' symposium

GDR apartment, Bemuurde Weerd 18B, Utrecht
A report on a symposium organized by the 2nd year students of the Master Of Fine Arts program, AKV/ St. Joost (‘s Hertogenbosch/ Breda)
Written by Sumire Kobayashi

Workshop D.I.T. Bricolage - St Joost MA Fine Art students' symposium


The monthly "mini-symposium" is a part of the master program, every time one of the student choose a theme for a symposium in relation to their theoretical research.

Symposium takes place in different location in collaboration with different art institutions. For the second time of the symposium this year, Spanish student Manuel Suarez who found a connection between his research subject 'bricoleur'-improvisational reassemble of resources-with GDR, chose the apartment to be a place for a discussion. According to Manuel, "a bricoleur is a domestic thinker, a home made thinker". His proposal was to read text by Michel de Certeau where the relation between tactics and strategy was discussed, the so-called passivity of the consumer to the active do-it-yourself/ home-made tactics of the user.



Along with the introduction of the GDR by Maiko, Casco team demonstrated how to use the big loom from Cottage Industry by Berlin based artist Travis Meinolf. Then Manuel read the text of Certeau, getting students familiarized with concept of strategy and tactics-Tactics as the art of the weak, etc. Unfortunately we had to leave in halfway, but I found Manuel's approach very interesting by positioning domestic practices as bricolage activity, at the same time I was not really able to see direct connection between this two subject matters, which I hoped to see more. (maybe because i wasn't there whole day I missed it.)

We also had a good discussion about the craftivim and its weak point raised by Kirsty Robertson during CHECK-IN on weaving. Soft material turning to a strong barrier to be used for stopping antiriot police, knitting with a group in a circle instead of hunger strike, Craftivism (craft + activism) is considered to be a very peaceful (harmless) and quiet act of resistance. But because its so appealing, media coverage tends to only focus on its craft aspect, therefore real issue this act is trying to raise actually gets neglected. This is so called 'The spectacle of crafitivism'. The same goes for a trend of typical 'grandma-practices' such as knitting and canning being a popular class activities among the elites in USA. These examples seem to warn us that we should not only reside in romance and nostalgia of domestic practices, but really to have something to say and strategy (!) behind it if we are to use this as a tool for revolution!



To enclose this article and think about how to operate such everyday resistance act collectively, maybe it is helpful to look at a concept of 'DIZ', an alternation of DIY created by Travis Meinolf:

"Do It Zusammen , (Do it together) the logical extension of the DIY ideal for the 21st century. "yourself" has been used in the original DIY label in opposition to having things done for you by others... but can be misinterpreted as a turning-in or turning-away from society at large, self-sufficiency as an isolating act. So, inspired by my current hometown Berlin, and the teleological nature of the alphabet, the next step, "DIZ" is born. "



NOTES

GDR Diary 2: Read-In for the possibility of community


Last Friday I participated in the Read-In and the group addressed several important issues from this experience in the feedback session after “reading-in”: the almost instant legitimization of the reading group when referred to as an artistic project, having as its consequence the access to an otherwise unvisitable private space; the legitimacy and ethical implications of bringing a preselected text into our host’s house versus following the host’s own suggestion, albeit with the risk of unexpectedly transforming a speculative action into the provision of a social service; the process of reading a text (its collective translation, interpretation and discussion) as a mediator of the interaction between hosts and visitors, and a subtle articulator of class, gender and ethnicity positions; photographic documentation that has archival intentions versus its possible interpretation as one of observation or surveillance and so on.




The search for community in Yang’s work is connected to a sense of place that is constructed by an individual experience struggling with abstract parameters. In this sense it is imaginary, but not utopian, and is best described through the notion of a “community of absence” or “negative community,” which is characterized by a lack or a denial of any sense of belonging. Einarsson and Yang use concepts of a dystopian, imaginary community in their work, which open up a space of potentiality. (…) The diversity and creativity of participation in experimental communities, the playful “care of the self” of informal communities, and the being-together of imaginary communities that build on the state of absence, correspond to a fragmented and agonistic public space. The concept of a “community” that refuses to function as a manipulative mass united by a common identity eventually implies the potential of resistance. (Nina Möntmann, “Transforming Communities”, 2007, pp. 50-1).

In “A Small Dictionary for Haegue Yang”, Doryun Chong (2008) also points to of the idea of community in Yang’s work. A community is an entity — a concept — that can be empowering and potent, idealistic and utopian, dysfunctional and even destructive. Despite the generally positive social implications it holds, the idea of community is at once complex and oversimplistic, strong and fragile. (…) Yang interprets what she calls the “community of absence” as a “community of the plural that shares nothing but ongoing self-examination and a strange kind of optimism”. Her interpretation is partly inspired by discussions between Maurice Blanchot and Jean-Luc Nancy around Georges Bataille, specifically in Nancy’s La communauté desoeuvré and Blanchot’s La communauté inavouable. Nancy’s reading of Bataille is critically indebted to Blanchot’s notion of désoeuvrement (…). Through this notion, both thinkers try to grasp Bataille’s concept of a community that does not rely on “work”, which is central to the idea of communism and necessarily defines human beings as producers. (…) It is in this light that Blanchot and Nancy try to steer “community” away from “work” and toward “inoperative” “nonwork” that must remain “unavowable” – that is, the community that refuses to acknowledge itself. Both see that when the community is recognized as such, it ceases to be. (pp. 143-4)


24 May 2010, 23.29 — posted by Mafalda

Edit