THE GRAND
DOMESTIC REVOLUTION

THE GRAND
DOMESTIC REVOLUTION

USER'S MANUAL

USER'S MANUAL

‘The Grand Domestic Revolution—User’s Manual’ (GDR) investigates the domestic space and its (changing) use through a variety of methods and disciplines, traversing the fields of art, design, architecture, urban planning, activism and theory. A number of artists and other practitioners contribute to this endeavour. Residents from 2009-2011 include Sepake Angiama, Paul Elliman, and Doris Denekamp who utilized neighbourhood and online research to create prototypes and interventions around the theme of (Green) Cooperativsm. Wietske Maas and Travis Meinolf experimented with Home Production; while 'interor' infrastuctural interventions for the furniture, library and hallways were created by ifau & Jesko Fezer, Mirjam Thomann and Graziela Kunsch. Current themes and residents from February–October 2011 include Kyohei Sakaguchi and Kateřina Šedá who will each investigate forms of usership in architectures; home and housing rights with Maria Pask and Nazima Kadir; the question of invisible and domestic labour taken up by Werker Magazine; Agency will continue its deliberations on copyright issues of domestic THINGS (gardens and textiles); and keywords in relations to food service work will be workshopped with Xu Tan. Parallel to this, the Read-in activity continues. Initiated by artist Annette Krauss and theatre maker, Read-in is an open reading group inhabiting a different neighbour’s home for every session.

LIBRARY

LIBRARY

The GDR library constitutes the backbone of our ongoing ‘living research’ and thus grows over time. The library offers points of engagement with the project and consists of different research materials such as books, articles, images and DVDs (artist’s video, films) that are available for viewing when visiting the apartment. The first installment was done by the GDR team and was later adapted by Sao Paulo-based artist Graziela Kunsch who suggested that the GDR team create thematic selections.

APARTMENT 18B

APARTMENT 18B

'The Grand Domestic Revolution-User's Manual' is a long-term project developed as Casco’s contribution to 'Utrecht Manifest: Biennial for Social Design'. The project deals with the evolutionary and collaborative process of “living” research in the contemporary domestic and private sphere – particularly in relation to the spatial imagining (or the built environment). It aims at re-articulating while exercising the notions of the social, the public and, eventually, the commons.

TOWN MEETINGS

IN AFFINITY

IN AFFINITY

Since August 2010, the GDR team have undertaken research in order to connect with the local neighbourhood on questions relating to peoples’ social conditions and material environments. Questionnaires, interviews, and conversations are the methods used to explore the themes and problems addressed in GDR, such as self-organised governance, co-operative living, and spatial organisation in and from the domestic sphere.

HOW DO WE WORK TOGETHER? (it’s not a rhetorical question)

TOWN MEETING MARCH
Saturday 26 March 2011 12.00-16.00h
GDR apartment, Bemuurde Weerd o.z.18b. With Matthijs de Bruijne, Phil Collins, Josien Pieterse, FNV Domestic Work campaigners and more

Still from Phil Collins, 'marxism today (prologue)' 2010


This month's TOWN MEETING starts with this concrete question, as a continuation of the last meeting on ways to critically engage with domestic and invisible labour. We ended it with a proposal to construct some kind of “artist working group” within a labour movement, but this immediately posed questions about artistic autonomy, the singularity of language and its attendant conflicts and more concretely, what aspect of the campaign will we work on? These questions will work in parallel with the urgent discussion on the rights for migrant domestic workers, looking into its implications within wider working and living conditions.

Presentations for the MARCH TOWN MEETING include artist Matthijs de Bruijne, graphic design studio Take A Detour, and film screening by visiting artist Phil Collins and filmmaker Josien Pieterse. Our guests, along with members of the FNV domestic worker's campaign and other interested actors, will expand on the ways artistic strategies of representation and can work in affinity with specific social movements.

AGENDA MARCH

  • Introductions, recap of February Town Meeting, and goal-setting
  • Presentation by Matthijs de Bruijne and Take a Detour on their collaboration for the project het afvalmuseum (trash museum) for the FNV Schoonmaker's anniversary of their strike at Utrecht Central Station
  • Screening of excerpt of 'marxism today (prologue)' by Phil Collins
  • Screening of by excerpt of 'The Years of the Truth' (De Jaren van de Waarheid) by Josien Pieterse
  • Question 1: What are potential artistic autonomies found in working “with” movements?
  • Question 2: What does the focus on domestic labour rights exclude and include in the debate and how does artist rights differ and connect, more specifically to labour rights?
  • Question 3: What artistic forms of representation of social movements are practiced, and can be imagined by artists and designers—can this point to new forms of contributions to political campaign?
  • Question 4: How will we work together?

The event is free and anyone is welcome to join!
RSVP is appreciated (email us at gdr@cascoprojects.org), but not required.

Links:
Review of 'marxism today (prologue)' in the guardian
Brochure download of FNV Bondegenoten Domestic Worker Rights


APRIL TOWN MEETING

30 APRIL 2011
Queen's Day! Participants of the meeting will join the street with ‘18B radio talk show’.


To receive more information about this and future TOWN MEETINGs, please email us at gdr@cascoprojects.org.


NOTES

GDR Diary 5: Reading Perec

Following Sepake’s suggestion, on my last day at the apartment I read the beginning of Georges Perec’s Life A User’s Manual (2008, [1978]) to the plants.

It starts with


and then continues:

"To begin with, the art of jigsaw puzzles seems of little substance, easily exhausted, wholly dealt with by a basic introduction to Gestalt: the perceived object — we may be dealing with a perceptual act, the acquisition of a skill, a physiological system, or, as in the present case, a wooden jigsaw puzzle — is not a sum of elements to be distinguished from each other and analysed discretely, but a pattern, that is to say a form, a structure: the element’s existence does not precede the existence of the whole, it comes neither before not after it, for he parts do not determine the pattern, but the pattern determines the parts: knowledge of the pattern and of its laws, of the set and its structure, could not be possible derived from discrete knowledge of the elements that compose it."

[Here I started thinking about the domestic space as multilayered, open and in continuous flux.]

"That means that you can look at a piece of a puzzle for three whole days, you can believe that you know all there is to know about its colouring and shape, and be no further on than when you started. The only thing that counts is the ability to link this piece to other pieces, and in that sense the art of the jigsaw puzzle has something in common with the art of go. The pieces are readable, take on a sense, only when assembled; in isolation, a puzzle piece means nothing — just an impossible question, an opaque challenge."

[And at this point I started thinking about the GDR itself as an assemblage. The GDR as a project that is itself composed of individual projects, pieces, events and encounters that share transversal concerns that are not necessarily inscribed into a set of harmonious assumptions. For example, Mirjam Thomann's reflection on space through the installation of the Two Part Door is radically different from Martha Rosler's archival project on If You Lived Here... as a reflection on the contemporary relevance and possibilities of the engagement of art with community activism focused in the issues of housing, gentrification and displacement.]

"But as soon as you have succeeded, after minutes of trial and error, or after a prodigious half-second flash of inspiration, in fitting it into one of its neighbours, the piece disappears, ceases to exist as a piece."

[The inexistence of an overarching framework of interpretation of the project is directly related to its definition as an exploratory reflection on spatiality as a condition to individual action and artistic engagement, here analysed through a focus on the domestic space. And in this direction, perhaps what matters the most is not the possible similarities that are to be identified among the individual projects but, on the contrary, the potential that is presented by the GDR to articulate the fundamental relationship between the multilayered depth of space and the agonistic character of the artistic-design interventions that can be developed with it in mind.]

"The intense difficulty preceding this link-up – which the English word puzzle indicates so well – not only loses its raison d’être, it seems never to have had any reason, so obvious does the solution appear. The new pieces so miraculously conjoined are henceforth one, which in its turn will be a source of error, hesitation, dismay, and expectation. (…)"

[Yes, I had managed to grasp something. And then I read a little longer ---this time in silence --- to myself.]


25 May 2010, 23.37 — posted by Mafalda

Edit